Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 105
- Last push
- Dec 31, 2021 (1625d ago)
Risk flags
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Jake Grigsby, Yanjun Qi
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Recent Offline Reinforcement Learning methods have succeeded in learning high-performance policies from fixed datasets of experience. A particularly effective approach learns to first identify and then mimic optimal decision-making strategies. Our work evaluates this method's ability to scale to vast datasets consisting almost entirely of sub-optimal noise. A thorough investigation on a custom benchmark helps identif ...
y several key challenges involved in learning from high-noise datasets. We re-purpose prioritized experience sampling to locate expert-level demonstrations among millions of low-performance samples. This modification enables offline agents to learn state-of-the-art policies in benchmark tasks using datasets where expert actions are outnumbered nearly 65:1.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Recent Offline Reinforcement Learning methods have succeeded in learning high-performance policies from fixed datasets of experience.
jakegrigsby/super_sac is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Official implementation from Papers with Code). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 42 GitHub stars.
Open jakegrigsby/deep_controlHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Only a historical official implementation is available.
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
Hardware requirements
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/jakegrigsby/deep_control.git
pip install -r requirements.txt No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
Official implementation from Papers with Code
A general model-free off-policy actor-critic implementation. Continuous and Discrete Soft Actor-Critic with multimodal observations, data augmentation, offline learning and behavioral cloning.
Advantage-Filtered Behavioral Cloning for Offline Continuous Control
No additional community repositories detected yet.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
None detected
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.