Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks

Published Jun 1, 2018
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Interpretability Methods Deep Neural Networks ImageNet Accuracy 50 paper-derived
Interpretability Methods Deep Neural Networks unmodified ImageNet Accuracy 76.68 paper-derived
Generation Birdsnap Top1Accuracy 66.65 paper-derived
Generation ImageNet Top1Accuracy 76.68 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Google Research

38,611 stars · 8,464 forks · Last push Aug 21, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (38611 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

google-research/google-research is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open google-research/google-research
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected google-research/google-research as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
38,611
Last push
Aug 21, 2026 (4d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (38611 stars)

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
LLNL/fastcam
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
44
Last push
Sep 29, 2020 (2157d)

Community adoption signal (44 stars) · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
40
Last push
Mar 4, 2020 (2366d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (40 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • google-research/google-research has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open google-research/google-research

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Research context

Tasks

Interpretability Methods Deep Neural Networks, Generation

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).