A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks
Results and benchmarks
A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks is the primary contribution described in this paper.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interpretability Methods Deep Neural Networks | ImageNet | Accuracy | 50 | paper-derived |
| Interpretability Methods Deep Neural Networks | unmodified ImageNet | Accuracy | 76.68 | paper-derived |
| Generation | Birdsnap | Top1Accuracy | 66.65 | paper-derived |
| Generation | ImageNet | Top1Accuracy | 76.68 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
Google Research
38,611 stars · 8,464 forks · Last push Aug 21, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (38611 stars)
google-research/google-research is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0).
Open google-research/google-research- No CI workflows detected
- Dependency manifest is missing
- Selected google-research/google-research as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 38,611
- Last push
- Aug 21, 2026 (4d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (38611 stars)
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 44
- Last push
- Sep 29, 2020 (2157d)
Community adoption signal (44 stars) · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 40
- Last push
- Mar 4, 2020 (2366d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (40 stars)
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- google-research/google-research has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- LLNL/fastcam
Confidence: Low · 44 stars
- tootouch/WhiteBox-Part1
Confidence: Low · 40 stars
- JianqiaoMao/PFFRA
Confidence: Low · 7 stars
- BaurothM/explainability-sanity-audit
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- tootouch/tootorch
Confidence: Low · 4 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
No trustworthy models matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceDatasets
- burnssa/judge-distillation-medical-interpretability
849 downloads · 0 likes · Updated Apr 29, 2026
- pcam-interpretability/dino_vit_attnmaps
90 downloads · 0 likes · Updated May 5, 2025
Spaces
Research context
Tasks
Interpretability Methods Deep Neural Networks, Generation
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).