Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
$τ^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment is the primary contribution described in this paper.
sierra-research/tau2-bench is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).
Open sierra-research/tau2-benchEvidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (1276 stars)
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (40 stars)
Risk flags
τ-Bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
Ready to reproduce
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/sierra-research/tau2-bench.git
pip install -e .No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Broaden model search
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceNo trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceEvaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXNeed human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.