Skip to content
← Back to explorer

HFEPX Archive Slice

HFEPX Daily Archive: 2026-01-29

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Apr 17, 2026). 13 papers are grouped in this daily page.

Read Full Context

Updated from current HFEPX corpus (Apr 17, 2026). 13 papers are grouped in this daily page. Common evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics, Simulation Env. Common annotation unit: Freeform. Frequently cited benchmark: ALFWorld. Common metric signal: cost. Use this page to compare protocol setup, judge behavior, and labeling design decisions before running new eval experiments. Newest paper in this set is from Jan 29, 2026.

Papers: 13 Last published: Jan 29, 2026 Global RSS

Researcher Quick Triage

Use this archive page for time-slice monitoring (what changed in evaluation methods, metrics, and protocol quality this period). Quality band: Medium .

High-Signal Coverage

100.0%

13 / 13 papers are not low-signal flagged.

Benchmark Anchors

15.4%

Papers with benchmark/dataset mentions in extraction output.

Metric Anchors

23.1%

Papers with reported metric mentions in extraction output.

  • 0 papers report explicit quality controls for this archive period.
  • Prioritize papers with both benchmark and metric anchors for reliable longitudinal comparisons.

Primary action: Use this slice as early signal only; benchmark/metric anchoring is limited for rigorous period-over-period claims.

Get this digest every Friday →

Subscribe

Why This Time Slice Matters

  • automatic metrics appears in 7.7% of papers in this hub.
  • ALFWorld is a recurring benchmark anchor for cross-paper comparisons in this page.
  • long-horizon tasks appears in 7.7% of papers, indicating agentic evaluation demand.

Protocol Takeaways For This Period

  • Quality-control reporting is sparse in this slice; prioritize papers with explicit calibration or adjudication steps.
  • Rater context is mostly unspecified rater pools, and annotation is commonly Freeform; use this to scope replication staffing.
  • Stratify by benchmark (ALFWorld vs CTI-Bench) before comparing methods.

Start Here (Highest-Signal Papers In This Slice)

Ranked by protocol completeness and evidence density for faster period-over-period review.

Protocol Matrix (Top 10)

Quickly compare method ingredients across this archive slice.

Paper Eval Modes Benchmarks Metrics Quality Controls
Embodied Task Planning via Graph-Informed Action Generation with Large Language Model

Jan 29, 2026

Simulation Env ALFWorld Pass@1, Cost Not reported
EnsembleLink: Accurate Record Linkage Without Training Data

Jan 29, 2026

Automatic Metrics Not reported Accuracy Not reported
Indic-TunedLens: Interpreting Multilingual Models in Indian Languages

Jan 29, 2026

Not reported MMLU Not reported Not reported
Temporal Sepsis Modeling: a Fully Interpretable Relational Way

Jan 29, 2026

Not reported Not reported Relevance Not reported
Sheaf Neural Networks and biomedical applications

Jan 29, 2026

Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
Learn-to-Distance: Distance Learning for Detecting LLM-Generated Text

Jan 29, 2026

Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
FBS: Modeling Native Parallel Reading inside a Transformer

Jan 29, 2026

Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
CausalEmbed: Auto-Regressive Multi-Vector Generation in Latent Space for Visual Document Embedding

Jan 29, 2026

Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
RedSage: A Cybersecurity Generalist LLM

Jan 29, 2026

Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
From Generative Modeling to Clinical Classification: A GPT-Based Architecture for EHR Notes

Jan 29, 2026

Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
Researcher Workflow (Detailed)

Checklist

  • Gap: Papers with explicit human feedback

    Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 45% target).

  • Gap: Papers reporting quality controls

    Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 30% target).

  • Moderate: Papers naming benchmarks/datasets

    Coverage is usable but incomplete (23.1% vs 35% target).

  • Strong: Papers naming evaluation metrics

    Coverage is strong (38.5% vs 35% target).

  • Gap: Papers with known rater population

    Coverage is a replication risk (0% vs 35% target).

  • Gap: Papers with known annotation unit

    Coverage is a replication risk (7.7% vs 35% target).

Strengths

  • This hub still surfaces a concentrated paper set for protocol triage and replication planning.

Known Gaps

  • Only 0% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (0% coverage).
  • Annotation unit is under-specified (7.7% coverage).

Suggested Next Analyses

  • Stratify by benchmark (ALFWorld vs CTI-Bench) before comparing methods.
  • Track metric sensitivity by reporting both cost and accuracy.

Recommended Queries

Known Limitations
  • Only 0% of papers report quality controls; prioritize calibration/adjudication evidence.
  • Rater population is under-specified (0% coverage).
  • Narrative synthesis is grounded in metadata and abstracts only; full-paper implementation details are not parsed.
Research Utility Snapshot (Detailed)

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (1)
  • Simulation Env (1)

Top Metrics

  • Cost (3)
  • Accuracy (1)
  • Coherence (1)
  • Mse (1)

Top Benchmarks

  • ALFWorld (1)
  • CTI Bench (1)
  • RedSage Bench (1)
  • WebArena (1)

Quality Controls

Papers In This Archive Slice

Recent Archive Slices

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.