Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Researcher Tools

Human Feedback and Eval Paper Explorer

A focused feed for RLHF, preference data, rater protocols, agent evaluation, and LLM-as-judge research. Every paper includes structured metadata for quick triage.

Total papers: 2 Search mode: keyword Shortlist (0) RSS

Featured Papers

Popular high-signal papers with direct links to full protocol pages.

Browse by Topic

Jump directly into tag and hub pages to crawl deeper content clusters.

Popular Tags

Top Protocol Hubs

Weekly Eval Paper Digest

The top RLHF, evaluation, and human feedback papers — curated and summarized every Friday.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Start Here By Objective

Pick your immediate research objective and jump directly to high-signal pages, not generic search.

Scale Your Evaluation Team

Need human evaluators for your benchmark or preference study? OpenTrain sources pre-vetted domain experts into your annotation pipeline.

Deep Research, Shallow Evaluation: A Case Study in Meta-Evaluation for Long-Form QA Benchmarks

Jena D. Hwang, Varsha Kishore, Amanpreet Singh, Dany Haddad, Aakanksha Naik, Malachi Hamada · Mar 6, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Expert Verification, General).

Score: 50% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Cold Status: Ready
Pairwise PreferenceExpert Verification Llm As Judge General
  • This has prompted evaluation frameworks that use LLM-as-judge protocols and claim verification, along with meta-evaluation frameworks that seek to validate these methods.
  • We show that pairwise preference rankings are best suited for system-level evaluation, while explicit metric-wise annotations and expert annotators are critical for reliable metric-level assessment, with subjectivity remaining a key…
Open paper
Multi-Agent Comedy Club: Investigating Community Discussion Effects on LLM Humor Generation

Shiwei Hong, Lingyao Li, Ethan Z. Rong, Chenxinran Shen, Zhicong Lu · Feb 16, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Expert Verification, General).

Score: 50% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Cold Status: Ready
Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating Multi Agent General
  • Prior work has explored multi-turn interaction and feedback for LLM writing, but evaluations still largely center on prompts and localized feedback, leaving persistent public reception in online communities underexamined.
  • Across 50 rounds (250 paired monologues) judged by five expert annotators using A/B preference and a 15-item rubric, discussion wins 75.6% of instances and improves Craft/Clarity (Δ = 0.440) and Social Response (Δ = 0.422), with occasional…
Open paper

Protocol Hubs