Skip to content

Researcher Tools

Human Feedback and Eval Paper Explorer

A focused feed for RLHF, preference data, rater protocols, agent evaluation, and LLM-as-judge research. Every paper includes structured metadata for quick triage.

Total papers: 3 Search mode: keyword Shortlist (0) RSS

Featured Papers

Popular high-signal papers with direct links to full protocol pages.

Browse by Topic

Jump directly into tag and hub pages to crawl deeper content clusters.

Popular Tags

Top Protocol Hubs

Weekly Eval Paper Digest

The top RLHF, evaluation, and human feedback papers — curated and summarized every Friday.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Start Here By Objective

Pick your immediate research objective and jump directly to high-signal pages, not generic search.

Scale Your Evaluation Team

Need human evaluators for your benchmark or preference study? OpenTrain sources pre-vetted domain experts into your annotation pipeline.

CounselReflect: A Toolkit for Auditing Mental-Health Dialogues

Yahan Li, Chaohao Du, Zeyang Li, Christopher Chun Kuizon, Shupeng Cheng, Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang · Mar 31, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Rubric Rating).

Score: 58% High protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Ready
Rubric RatingExpert Verification Human Eval Web Browsing Coding
  • The system integrates two families of evaluation signals: (i) 12 model-based metrics produced by task-specific predictors, and (ii) rubric-based metrics that extend coverage via a literature-derived library (69 metrics) and user-defined…
  • Human evaluation includes a user study with 20 participants and an expert review with 6 mental-health professionals, suggesting that CounselReflect supports understandable, usable, and trustworthy auditing.
Open paper
Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Rubric Rating).

Score: 58% High protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Ready
Rubric Rating Human Eval Coding
  • To address this, we introduce RINoBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for large-scale evaluation of research idea novelty judgments.
  • Using this benchmark, we evaluate several state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on their ability to judge the novelty of research ideas.
Open paper
Automated Coding of Communication Data Using ChatGPT: Consistency Across Subgroups

Jiangang Hao, Wenju Cui, Patrick Kyllonen, Emily Kerzabi · Oct 23, 2025

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Rubric Rating).

Score: 53% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Cold Status: Ready
Rubric Rating Human EvalAutomatic Metrics Coding
  • Prior research has established that ChatGPT can be directly instructed with coding rubrics to code the communication data and achieves accuracy comparable to human raters.
  • Our results show that ChatGPT-based coding perform consistently in the same way as human raters across gender or racial/ethnic groups, demonstrating the possibility of its use in large-scale assessments of collaboration and communication.
Open paper

Protocol Hubs

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.