Skip to content

Researcher Tools

Human Feedback and Eval Paper Explorer

A focused feed for RLHF, preference data, rater protocols, agent evaluation, and LLM-as-judge research. Every paper includes structured metadata for quick triage.

Total papers: 14 Search mode: keyword Shortlist (0) RSS

Featured Papers

Popular high-signal papers with direct links to full protocol pages.

Browse by Topic

Jump directly into tag and hub pages to crawl deeper content clusters.

Popular Tags

Top Protocol Hubs

Weekly Eval Paper Digest

The top RLHF, evaluation, and human feedback papers — curated and summarized every Friday.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Start Here By Objective

Pick your immediate research objective and jump directly to high-signal pages, not generic search.

Scale Your Evaluation Team

Need human evaluators for your benchmark or preference study? OpenTrain sources pre-vetted domain experts into your annotation pipeline.

CounselReflect: A Toolkit for Auditing Mental-Health Dialogues

Yahan Li, Chaohao Du, Zeyang Li, Christopher Chun Kuizon, Shupeng Cheng, Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang · Mar 31, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 58% High protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Ready
Rubric RatingExpert Verification Human Eval Web Browsing Coding
  • The system integrates two families of evaluation signals: (i) 12 model-based metrics produced by task-specific predictors, and (ii) rubric-based metrics that extend coverage via a literature-derived library (69 metrics) and user-defined…
  • Human evaluation includes a user study with 20 participants and an expert review with 6 mental-health professionals, suggesting that CounselReflect supports understandable, usable, and trustworthy auditing.
Open paper
Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 58% High protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Ready
Rubric Rating Human Eval Coding
  • To address this, we introduce RINoBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for large-scale evaluation of research idea novelty judgments.
  • Using this benchmark, we evaluate several state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on their ability to judge the novelty of research ideas.
Open paper
Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 58% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Ready
Human EvalSimulation Env Long Horizon Coding
  • Within this framework, we construct framing-sensitive agent personas by fine-tuning language models with framing-conditioned loss attenuation, inducing targeted biases while preserving overall task competence.
  • Human evaluation further confirms that FrameRef's generated framings measurably affect human judgment.
Open paper
IntelliAsk: Learning to Ask High-Quality Research Questions via RLVR

Karun Sharma, Vidushee Vats, Shengzhi Li, Yuxiang Wang, Zhongtian Sun, Prayag Tiwari · Jan 23, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 58% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Ready
Pairwise PreferenceExpert Verification Human Eval Coding
  • Peer review relies on substantive, evidence-based questions, yet current LLMs generate surface-level queries that perform worse than human reviewer questions in expert evaluation.
  • To address this gap, we curate a high-quality dataset of reviewer questions from OpenReview and conduct a human preference study where expert annotators evaluate question-paper pairs across three dimensions: effort, evidence, and grounding.
Open paper

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 58% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Fallback
Human EvalLlm As Judge Coding
  • Gemini also serves as an LLM-as-a-judge system for automatic evaluation in our experiments.
  • The automated judgments were verified through human evaluation, demonstrating high agreement (kappa = 0.87).
Open paper
EvoScientist: Towards Multi-Agent Evolving AI Scientists for End-to-End Scientific Discovery

Yougang Lyu, Xi Zhang, Xinhao Yi, Yuyue Zhao, Shuyu Guo, Wenxiang Hu · Mar 9, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 58% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Fallback
Human Eval Multi Agent Coding
  • To address this, we introduce EvoScientist, an evolving multi-agent AI scientist framework that continuously improves research strategies through persistent memory and self-evolution.
  • EvoScientist comprises three specialized agents: a Researcher Agent (RA) for scientific idea generation, an Engineer Agent (EA) for experiment implementation and execution, and an Evolution Manager Agent (EMA) that distills insights from…
Open paper
Habibi: Laying the Open-Source Foundation of Unified-Dialectal Arabic Speech Synthesis

Yushen Chen, Junzhe Liu, Yujie Tu, Zhikang Niu, Yuzhe Liang, Chunyu Qiang · Jan 20, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 58% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Fallback
Human Eval Long Horizon Coding
  • Key barriers include substantial cross-dialect lexical and phonological divergence, scarce synthesis-grade data, and the absence of a standardized multi-dialect evaluation benchmark.
  • We further release the first standardized multi-dialect Arabic TTS benchmark, comprising over 11,000 utterances across 7 dialect subsets with manually verified transcripts.
Open paper
Learning to Predict Future-Aligned Research Proposals with Language Models

Heng Wang, Pengcheng Jiang, Jiashuo Sun, Zhiyi Shi, Haofei Yu, Jiawei Han · Mar 28, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 55% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Fallback
Human EvalAutomatic Metrics MathCoding
  • Across Llama-3.1 and Qwen2.5 models, future-aligned tuning improves future alignment over unaligned baselines (up to +10.6% overall FAS), and domain-expert human evaluation corroborates improved proposal quality.
  • Finally, we demonstrate practical impact by implementing two model-generated proposals with a code agent, obtaining 4.17% accuracy gain on MATH from a new prompting strategy and consistent improvements for a novel model-merging method.
Open paper
DeEscalWild: A Real-World Benchmark for Automated De-Escalation Training with SLMs

Md Hasebul Hasan, Krity Haque Charu, Eshwara Prasad Sridhar, Shuchisnigdha Deb, Mohammad A. Islam · Mar 20, 2026

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 55% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Warm Status: Fallback
Human EvalLlm As Judge LawCoding
  • To bridge this gap, we present DeEscalWild, a novel benchmark dataset curated from a multi-stage pipeline of in-the-wild police-civilian interactions extracted from publicly available video repositories.
  • Extensive experiments demonstrate that SLMs fine-tuned on this data significantly outperform their base counterparts across ROUGE-L, BLEU-4, METEOR, BERTScore, Realism Score, and human evaluation metrics.
Open paper
Automated Coding of Communication Data Using ChatGPT: Consistency Across Subgroups

Jiangang Hao, Wenju Cui, Patrick Kyllonen, Emily Kerzabi · Oct 23, 2025

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 53% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Cold Status: Ready
Rubric Rating Human EvalAutomatic Metrics Coding
  • Prior research has established that ChatGPT can be directly instructed with coding rubrics to code the communication data and achieves accuracy comparable to human raters.
  • Our results show that ChatGPT-based coding perform consistently in the same way as human raters across gender or racial/ethnic groups, demonstrating the possibility of its use in large-scale assessments of collaboration and communication.
Open paper
XtraGPT: Context-Aware and Controllable Academic Paper Revision via Human-AI Collaboration

Nuo Chen, Andre Lin HuiKai, Jiaying Wu, Junyi Hou, Zining Zhang, Qian Wang · May 16, 2025

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 53% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Cold Status: Ready
Pairwise PreferenceCritique Edit Human Eval Coding
  • To address these scenarios, we propose a human-AI collaboration framework for academic paper revision, centered on criteria-guided intent alignment and context-aware modeling.
  • Both automated preference assessments and human evaluations confirm the effectiveness of XtraGPT in improving scientific drafts.
Open paper
Incentivizing Agentic Reasoning in LLM Judges via Tool-Integrated Reinforcement Learning

Ran Xu, Jingjing Chen, Jiayu Ye, Yu Wu, Jun Yan, Carl Yang · Oct 27, 2025

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 50% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Cold Status: Ready
Pairwise Preference Human Eval Coding
  • Motivated by the success of tool-integrated reasoning (TIR) in numerous tasks, we propose TIR-Judge, an end-to-end RL framework for training LLM judges that integrates a code executor for precise evaluation.
  • On seven public benchmarks, TIR-Judge surpasses strong reasoning-based judges by up to 6.4% (pointwise) and 7.7% (pairwise), and achieves listwise performance comparable to Claude-Opus-4 despite having only 8B parameters.
Open paper
Paper2Code: Automating Code Generation from Scientific Papers in Machine Learning

Minju Seo, Jinheon Baek, Seongyun Lee, Sung Ju Hwang · Apr 24, 2025

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 53% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Cold Status: Fallback
Human Eval Multi Agent Coding
  • Inspired by this, we introduce PaperCoder, a multi-agent LLM framework that transforms machine learning papers into operational code repositories.
  • Moreover, each phase is instantiated through a set of specialized agents designed to collaborate effectively across the pipeline.
Open paper
EasyAnimate: High-Performance Video Generation Framework with Hybrid Windows Attention and Reward Backpropagation

Jiaqi Xu, Kunzhe Huang, Xinyi Zou, Yunkuo Chen, Bo Liu, MengLi Cheng · May 29, 2024

Citations: 0

Match reason: Matches selected tags (Coding, Human Eval).

Score: 53% Moderate protocol signal Freshness: Cold Status: Fallback
Pairwise Preference Human Eval Coding
  • To enhance video generation quality, we optimize EasyAnimate using reward backpropagation to better align with human preferences.
  • The EasyAnimate achieves state-of-the-art performance on both the VBench leaderboard and human evaluation.
Open paper

Protocol Hubs

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.