Nathan J.

Key Skills

Software

Other

Top Subject Matter

LLM evaluation (accuracy, safety, factuality, instruction following) in business and civic contexts

Prompt evaluation and business-domain prompt/response quality for AI training

Legal Services & Contract Review

Top Data Types

Text

Document

Top Task Types

Prompt + Response Writing (SFT)

Freelancer Overview

Founder - Executive Director / AI & Ethics Strategy Builder (AI-era positioning, ethical framework development, and AI e. Brings 40+ years of professional experience across legal operations, contract review, compliance, and structured analysis. Core strengths include Other. Education includes Bachelor of Arts, University of California, Berkeley (1991) and N/A, Diablo Valley College (1987). AI-training focus includes data types such as Text and labeling workflows including Evaluation, Rating, and Prompt + Response Writing (SFT).

Labeling Experience

AI Trainer / LLM Evaluator / Prompt & Response Quality Specialist (freelance target contract focus)

OtherTextPrompt + Response Writing (SFT)

Designed and refined prompts and response guidance grounded in real-world business context, systems thinking, and customer-service judgment. Produced business-domain aligned language to improve clarity, ethical behavior, and operational usefulness. Translated stakeholder needs into structured rubric-driven evaluation and actionable prompt/output improvements. • Developed prompt evaluation criteria tied to user intent and quality dimensions • Created rewrite suggestions and improvement guidance for responses • Built ethical/accuracy-focused language requirements for evaluators and outputs • Produced education and public-policy-adjacent messaging that emphasizes factual care and clarity

2022 - Present

Founder - Executive Director / AI & Ethics Strategy Builder (AI-era positioning, ethical framework development, and AI evaluation/quality work)

OtherText

Performed LLM response evaluation and quality assurance across accuracy, usefulness, instruction-following, reasoning quality, tone, safety, clarity, and completeness. Applied rubric-based pass/fail criteria and issue-spotting to detect factuality problems, logical inconsistencies, hallucination risks, and policy-sensitive wording. Provided strong written feedback with scoring rationales and user-outcome assessments to improve prompt/output alignment with intent. • Evaluated instruction-following and reasoning quality using structured scoring/rubric methods • Conducted factuality, hallucination, and logical consistency reviews • Assessed safety, ethics, and trust/risk factors in response wording • Delivered concise rewrite suggestions and task decomposition guidance

2022 - Present

Education

Work History