Ongoing evaluation and quality-assurance work in a remote support environment
Conducted human-quality evaluation of customer-support interactions that functionally parallels RLHF preference data collection and review. Focused on identifying issues in response quality, surfacing errors, and ensuring responses addressed user needs accurately. Used consistent evaluation criteria to support scalable feedback and annotation quality for AI training. • Checked responses for helpfulness, completeness, and correctness • Identified errors and gaps relevant to hallucination-like failures • Maintained high satisfaction metrics via quality assurance • Enabled repeatable evaluation criteria through documentation