For employers

Hire this AI Trainer

Sign in or create an account to invite AI Trainers to your job.

Invite to Job
G
Ghaniyah A.

Ghaniyah A.

Nigeria flagAbuja, Nigeria

Key Skills

Software

No software listed

Top Subject Matter

No subject matter listed

Top Data Types

No data types listed

Top Task Types

No task types listed

Freelancer Overview

OPEYEMI OYEJOBI Administrative & Data Operations Professional āœ‰ [email protected] | šŸ“ž +234 802 706 2349 | šŸ‡³šŸ‡¬ Nigeria | Remote PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Detail-oriented and versatile professional with hands-on experience in data operations, content quality assurance, and administrative support. Skilled at managing structured data tasks including annotation, review, evaluation and transformation across digital platforms. Combines strong written communication skills - from drafting professional correspondence to summarizing complex content - with a methodical approach to accuracy and quality. Proven ability to manage multiple priorities, work independently in remote environments and consistently deliver high-quality outputs. Seeking a corporate role where her blend of administrative competence and data literacy can drive operational excellence. CORE COMPETENCIES Technical & Data Skills Data Annotation Data Entry & Review Data Summarization Map & Image Evaluation List Transformation Quality Assurance Administrative & Communication Skills Professional Correspondence Executive Summarization Proofreading & Editing Preference Ranking Content Tone Rewriting Records Management PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Executive Assistant / Content & Quality Analyst | BabcoName 2024 – Till date OPEYEMI OYEJOBI Administrative & Data Operations Professional āœ‰ [email protected] | šŸ“ž +234 802 706 2349 | šŸ‡³šŸ‡¬ Nigeria | Remote Data Annotation | Data Entry & Review | Data Summarization Map & Image Eva

Labeling Experience

CYU

TextTextText SummarizationText Summarization

Project Scope: Code-named Navy Zinc, this project evaluates the "Catch You Up" (CYU) feature. The feature uses a cluster algorithm to group three semantic-related webpages into a "Cluster" and utilizes an LLM to generate a concise summary point (up to 3 words) to help users organize and relocate websites. The evaluation focuses on ensuring these summaries are correct, grounded, safe and relevant. Evaluation Workflow (5 Steps): Review Input: Read the website titles and feature text to identify the shared core idea using a digital notepad. Skip ungradable tasks (e.g., gibberish or foreign language). Evaluate Input: Assess the cluster's safety/harmfulness, flag structural irregularities and determine if the 3 websites share a consistent core idea. Evaluate Responses: Judge the LLM summary based on comprehensiveness (capturing the core theme and entities), groundedness (absence of hallucinations/inaccuracies) and overall satisfaction. Pairwise Comparison: Compare and rank two model responses side-by-side. Comments: Provide written justification and notes on edge cases. Project Structure & Size: Each evaluation task strictly consists of 1 cluster containing 3 websites. Each website provides 2 text elements (Website Title and Feature Text). The generated output is highly constrained, with a maximum length of 3 words. Quality Measures: Labelers must penalize summaries that hallucinate ungrounded information or strike a poor balance in precision (i.e being too broad/vague or overly narrow). Conversely, summaries must be rewarded for retaining shared unique entities (like specific names or locations). If a cluster is inconsistent, a broader, valid overarching theme is still considered acceptable.

2025 - Present