Image Object Labeler & Visual Concept Verifier (Contractor) | SynapseMind
No description provided.
Hire this AI Trainer
Sign in or create an account to invite AI Trainers to your job.
No software listed
AI Data Evaluator (Contractor) — DataAnnotation (Remote). Brings 4+ years of professional experience across complex professional workflows, research, and quality-focused execution. Core strengths include DataAnnotation, TELUS Digital, and SynapseMind. Education includes Master of Science, University of Bath (2027) and Bachelor of Science, University of Nairobi (2025). AI-training focus includes data types such as Text, Document, and Image and labeling workflows including Evaluation, Rating, and Classification.
No description provided.
Labels image content according to predefined annotation guidelines to support visual recognition training. Evaluates visual statements by determining whether they are true, false, or unclear using structured judgment. Applies rubric-based scoring to produce consistent labels across large datasets. • Image classification based on guideline categories • Visual statement triage (true/false/unclear) • Rubric-based scoring for consistency • Accurate labeling across large-scale image sets
Reviews and evaluates digital content for maps, news, audio, and relevance tasks using structured evaluation criteria. Assesses factual accuracy, credibility, and information quality while determining overall relevance. Conducts online research to verify claims by cross-referencing sources and judging reliability across content categories. • Credibility and factual accuracy assessment • Relevance labeling/rating using criteria • Claim verification via online research • Cross-referencing sources for reliability
Evaluates AI-generated mathematical and technical content for factual accuracy, logical consistency, and reasoning quality. Identifies specific issues and provides structured written feedback consistent with project rubrics. Applies detailed guidelines reliably across high-volume human-in-the-loop workflows while maintaining quality assurance standards. • Error detection in math/technical reasoning • Rubric-aligned scoring and issue classification • Actionable written explanations of inconsistencies • Consistent QA across repeated guideline application
Evaluates AI-generated text for factual correctness, logical reasoning quality, safety, and appropriateness using rubric-based scoring. Compares responses to detailed evaluation criteria and provides nuanced, actionable written feedback. Applies complex, shifting annotation guidelines across high-volume, time-sensitive tasks. • Factuality verification and claim plausibility checks • Rubric-aligned scoring for reasoning quality and safety • Structured feedback to support model improvement • Guideline compliance under high throughput
Master of Science, Electrical Engineering
Bachelor of Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Graduate Teaching Assistant
Graduate Research Assistant